91制片厂视频

Accountability

Administration Unveils ESEA Reauthorization Blueprint

Aims to Address Concerns About NCLB Inflexibility, Look Beyond Test Scores
By Alyson Klein & Michele McNeil 鈥 March 16, 2010 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

U.S. Secretary of 91制片厂视频 Arne Duncan has released broad principles for renewing the Elementary and Secondary 91制片厂视频 Act that seek to address perennial complaints that the law鈥檚 current version鈥攖he No Child Left Behind Act鈥攊s inflexible and focuses too narrowly on student test scores to get a picture of a school鈥檚 achievement.

The Obama administration鈥檚 long-anticipated blueprint for overhauling the Bush-era NCLB law seeks to maintain the current statute鈥檚 focus on disaggregating data and improving the performance of particular student groups, such as students in special education.

The administration is planning to look beyond the current law鈥檚 focus on test scores in assessing schools鈥 performance and also report on factors such as attendance, course completion, and school climate. It would also permit states to expand the subjects tested beyond reading and mathematics.

鈥淲e鈥檝e got to get accountability right this time so it actually drives improvement in student achievement,鈥 Mr. Duncan said in a March 12 conference call with reporters. He added there were three overarching goals with the newly released blueprint: setting a high bar for students and schools, rewarding excellence and success, and maintaining local control and flexibility.

The looming 2014 deadline under NCLB鈥攖he date by which all students are supposed to be proficient in reading and math鈥攚ould essentially go away under the department鈥檚 blueprint. States instead would be given time to adopt new college- and career-ready standards, and they would set performance targets against those new standards, said Carmel Martin, the department鈥檚 assistant secretary for planning, evaluation, and policy development. But no new absolute deadline would be established, she said.

The department said it will work with Congress during the transition period, as the original 2014 deadline approaches and before states are able to adopt college- and career-ready standards. It will also work with Congress to come up with a new name for this next edition of the ESEA, to replace the No Child Left Behind label.

Annual Assessments

One thing that would carry over from the NCLB era, however, is the yearly schedule for assessing students, Ms. Martin said in the conference call.

The Department of 91制片厂视频 released the outline of the ESEA plan to news organizations on March 12 and provided additional details in the telephone briefing with reporters.

To address complaints that the NCLB law doesn鈥檛 make a clear distinction between schools that are consistently struggling to raise the achievement of all their students and schools that are having trouble only with particular student populations, the Obama administration is seeking to differentiate interventions for schools that have varying difficulty in meeting the law鈥檚 goals.

The new vision for ESEA would provide local and state flexibility in determining what interventions were necessary in most schools. And broadly, the department says there would be consequences and rewards for districts and states as well as schools.

But the bottom 5 percent of schools would be forced to use the department鈥檚 four turnaround models that now govern the Title I School Improvement Grant program. The next-lowest 5 percent would be on a 鈥渨arning鈥 list and be required to take action using research-based interventions, although the department would not mandate one of the four turnaround models.

In addition, states would be required to identify schools with the greatest achievement gaps and take aggressive action to fix the problem. If, within three years, those students failed to improve, the department would require the state to take over the school鈥檚 Title I spending.

The proposal to set up different tiers of sanctions was widely anticipated by most observers. The 91制片厂视频 Department already allows some states to use such a system through a 鈥渄ifferentiated consequences鈥 pilot project, created in 2008 under Secretary Duncan鈥檚 predecessor, Margaret Spellings.

No Mandatory SES

But, in an important policy shift, schools that failed to meet achievement targets would not be mandated to provide school choice or supplemental educational services, or SES.

Mr. Duncan had already signaled that the SES and public-school-choice provisions under NCLB were not acceptable to him. Last April, in light of the $10 billion in additional Title I money flowing to states and school districts from the federal economic-stimulus package, he invited states to apply for waivers to make those provisions more flexible. So far, the department has granted 43 waivers.

The renewal plan seeks to give teachers a voice in school improvement efforts by using still-to-be-specified surveys about working conditions and school climate.

And it would seek to strengthen provisions in current law that require states to make sure their most effective teachers are distributed equitably among high- and low-poverty schools, such as by providing more reporting and transparency.

The blueprint also calls for the federal government to 鈥渆ncourage funding equity,鈥 such as by requiring schools and districts to more clearly show how resources are being distributed among high- and low-poverty schools.

Under the blueprint, states would be able to measure individual students鈥 academic growth, rather than comparing different cohorts of students with each other, as under current law.

The 91制片厂视频 Department already has a pilot program authorizing the use of such 鈥済rowth models鈥 that was put in place in 2005 and opened up to all 50 states in 2007.

The ESEA was first enacted in 1965 under President Lyndon B. Johnson as part of a package of programs aimed at combating poverty, known as the 鈥淕reat Society.鈥 The NCLB law was signed by President George W. Bush in 2002, after winning overwhelming bipartisan support in Congress.

Reauthorization has been pending since 2007. That year, Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., chairman of the House 91制片厂视频 and Labor Committee, introduced a discussion draft that failed to garner sufficient support in Congress.

The Obama administration had made some of its reauthorization priorities clear in advance of the blueprint鈥檚 release.

A version of this article appeared in the March 17, 2010 edition of 91制片厂视频 Week as Administration Unveils ESEA Reauthorization Blueprint

Events

Recruitment & Retention Webinar Keep Talented Teachers and Improve Student Outcomes
Keep talented teachers and unlock student success with strategic planning based on insights from Apple 91制片厂视频 and educational leaders.鈥
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of 91制片厂视频 Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Families & the Community Webinar
Family Engagement: The Foundation for a Strong School Year
Learn how family engagement promotes student success with insights from National PTA, AASA鈥痑nd leading districts and schools.鈥
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of 91制片厂视频 Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Special 91制片厂视频 Webinar
How Early Adopters of Remote Therapy are Improving IEPs
Learn how schools are using remote therapy to improve IEP compliance & scalability while delivering outcomes comparable to onsite providers.
Content provided by 

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide 鈥 elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of 91制片厂视频 Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Accountability Sponsor
Demystifying Accreditation and Accountability
Accreditation and accountability are two distinct processes with different goals, yet the distinction between them is sometimes lost among educators.
Content provided by Cognia
Various actions for strategic thinking and improvement planning process cycle
Photo provided by Cognia庐
Accountability What the Research Says More than 1 in 4 Schools Targeted for Improvement, Survey Finds
The new federal findings show schools also continue to struggle with absenteeism.
2 min read
Vector illustration of diverse children, students climbing up on a top of a stack of staggered books.
iStock/Getty
Accountability Opinion What鈥檚 Wrong With Online Credit Recovery? This Teacher Will Tell You
The 鈥渨hatever it takes鈥 approach to increasing graduation rates ends up deflating the value of a diploma.
5 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Accountability Why a Judge Stopped Texas from Issuing A-F School Ratings
Districts argued the new metric would make it appear as if schools have worsened鈥攅ven though outcomes have actually improved in many cases.
2 min read
Laura Baker91制片厂视频 Week via Canva  (1)
Canva