91制片厂视频

Special Report
Federal

Changes Urged in Rules for Federal Innovation Aid

By Michele McNeil 鈥 November 19, 2009 6 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print
Email Copy URL

Includes updates and/or revisions.

As the U.S. Department of 91制片厂视频 prepares final rules for the $650 million , officials face strong concerns from school districts and philanthropies that requiring matching funds from the private sector is unworkable and would turn foundations into the gatekeepers for the federal grants.

Concern about the proposed matching-funds requirement for the so-called 鈥渋3鈥 grants, which will be given out next year to districts through the economic-stimulus program, was a common thread among the 346 responses the department received during a 30-day public comment period that ended Nov. 9.

But that wasn鈥檛 the only big concern about how the department is looking to dole out the grants, a small鈥攖hough highly coveted鈥攑iece of some $100 billion in stimulus aid for education.

Many school districts objected to the requirement in the proposed rules that applicants show strong evidence of past success in order to justify funding for an innovative strategy, while many education researchers thought the department should be even stricter. Other commenters didn鈥檛 like that the department placed caps on individual award amounts.

Fine-Tuning the i3 Proposal

Those commenting on the 91制片厂视频 Department鈥檚 draft rules for the innovation fund see some big potential pitfalls:

On the rigor of the evidence that would be required to compete for a grant:

鈥淎 number of the department鈥檚 own program priorities and models that are reflected in Race to the Top and School Improvement grant notices would not meet an acceptable level of evidentiary effectiveness articulated in the draft notice [in certain categories]. ... 鈥
Michael Casserly, Executive Director, Council of the Great City Schools

On a 20 percent required match from the private sector:

鈥淸The match] makes philanthropies de facto gatekeepers for applicants by requiring the match at the time of application; it privileges those organizations that already have relationships with large foundations.鈥
Allan Golston, President, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation United States Program

鈥淭he 20 percent match is not viable. Rural areas with the private sector to provide such a match should not be expected to exist in the proposed definition of 鈥榬ural鈥.鈥
Paul D. Stapleton, Superintendent, Halifax County Public Schools, Virginia

On a requirement that districts have met adequate yearly progress for two years in a row to be eligible:

鈥淪ince none of Florida鈥檚 67 school districts met ayp in the last two consecutive years, this requirement would remove all [districts] in Florida as eligible applicants.鈥
Palm Beach County School District, Florida

鈥淓xcluding districts that have not met ayp ... excludes districts and students most in need of new, innovative educational initiatives.鈥
Meria Joel Carstarphen, Superintendent, Austin Independent School District, Texas

On the program鈥檚 overall aim:

鈥淭he department [should] recognize, and revise the guidance to reflect, that it is an entire school system鈥攏ot a single project in a single school鈥攖hat produces the system-wide results the proposed guidance calls for.鈥
American Association of School Administrators

Source: U.S. Department of 91制片厂视频

And many urban school districts took issue with a proposed competitive preference to be given to projects that would help address the needs of rural districts, which are often considered underdogs to the big, urban ones in large-scale grant competitions. In the words of the Palm Beach County, Fla., district, prioritizing rural schools 鈥渋s overtly unfair in disadvantaging all other applicants.鈥

Philanthropies Respond

Still, some of the strongest criticism was reserved for the idea that districts or other applicants would have to secure 20 percent in matching funds from the private sector and philanthropies, or seek a waiver from the department.

The influential Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the biggest education philanthropy of them all, was among the critics.

Such a match 鈥渋s unworkable in its demands of the philanthropic organizations: It makes philanthropies de facto gatekeepers for applicants by requiring the match at the time of application; it privileges those organizations that already have relationships with large foundations,鈥 wrote Allan Golston, the president of the Seattle-based foundation鈥檚 United States Program.

The Arkansas-based Walton Family Foundation, a leading K-12 donor that was built by the family that founded the Wal-Mart retail chain, noted that many philanthropies commit their grant money years out, and wouldn鈥檛 be able to find room in their budgets, at this late notice, for new grants to school systems.

Districts, meanwhile, pointed out that the sluggish economy will make raising private dollars very difficult.

鈥淭he current economic climate, to which [the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act] was a response, will make it difficult for school districts to find private, external partners able to supply funding matches for much-needed education programs,鈥 wrote Meria Joel Carstarphen, the superintendent of the Austin Independent School District in Texas.

Awards Next Year

The i3 grants are part of the $787 billion economic-recovery package passed by Congress in February. The department has not said when the final rules and applications will be available; however, the grants have to be awarded by September 2010. The only two types of eligible applicants are school districts, and nonprofit groups working in conjunction with a district or a consortium of public schools.

The grants, which are meant to expand promising, innovative education-improvement practices at the district level, would be divided into three tiers, with programs that have already shown evidence of success eligible for the heftiest grants of up to $50 million each.

A second category of 鈥渧alidation鈥 grants, of up to $30 million each, would go to programs with moderate evidence of success. The smallest grants, of up to $5 million each, would be linked to programs that have 鈥渞easonable research-based findings or theories.鈥

Many of those commenting on the draft rules focused on how much evidence should be required to justify a grant, illustrating the tension the 91制片厂视频 Department faces in funding innovative, but often untested, education strategies without squandering money on something that isn鈥檛 going to work.

One line of argument, offered mostly by school districts, was that the level of evidence required for the largest grants would favor a select, few 鈥渟ilver-bullet鈥 reforms, in the words of New York City Schools Chancellor Joel I. Klein.

In a similar vein, Ariela Rozman, the chief executive officer of the New Teacher Project, a New York City-based teacher-training organization, said that although the goal of i3 is to spur innovation, the 鈥渄raft notice favors the replication of mature projects.鈥

But the department鈥檚 own research arm, the Institute of 91制片厂视频 Sciences, and the American 91制片厂视频al Research Association, are urging that even more rigorous evidence be required, such as by placing heavier emphasis on the results of well-designed, randomized experiments over less-rigorous research studies.

Capacity Issues

Many school districts, however, maintain they do not have the capacity or knowledge to find robust research that supports their programs, or that many school officials can鈥檛 communicate in the language of researchers about terms such as 鈥渆ffect size鈥 or 鈥渟tatistical significance.鈥

鈥淒etermining the effect size of a given initiative is something that highly specialized researchers can do, but that school systems鈥攚hose job it is to implement a strategy or program鈥攇enerally do not have the capacity to do well,鈥 wrote Randi Weingarten, the president of the 1.4 million-member American Federation of Teachers.

Others warn that the requirements will be especially burdensome for rural school districts, which don鈥檛 have large central office staffs to help write and research grant proposals.

Mark Bielang, the superintendent of the Paw Paw public schools, in southwestern Michigan, said in an interview that the i3 grants aren鈥檛 on most rural superintendents鈥 radar screens, even though there鈥檚 a competitive edge to applications focusing on rural schools.

鈥淢any of us simply do not have the capacity to spend all of this time applying for grants,鈥 he said.

Legislative Fix

Within the comments, there was also a resounding chorus of agreement with the department鈥檚 efforts to widen the eligibility for the grants, which are currently limited by the economic-stimulus law to those districts that make adequate yearly progress under the No Child Left Behind Act for the previous two consecutive years.

Language to remove that eligibility requirement is contained in both the Senate and House education appropriations bills pending in Congress. The legislation could pass by the end of the year, or just in time for the final i3 regulations, which are expected within the next several weeks.

In its formal comments, the Hillsborough County, Fla., school district pointed out that if the AYP requirement sticks, no Florida school district would be eligible, since none of the state鈥檚 67 districts passed that bar.

In fact, according to the latest data provided by the 91制片厂视频 Department, nearly 2,600 districts did not make AYP for the 2006-07 and 2007-08 school years. That鈥檚 about 18 percent of the nation鈥檚 nearly 14,000 school systems, and includes large, urban districts in Boston, Chicago, Dallas, the District of Columbia, and Seattle.

Coverage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is supported in part by grants from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, at , and the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, at .
A version of this article appeared in the December 02, 2009 edition of 91制片厂视频 Week as Officials Urged to Retool Draft 鈥榠3' Rules

Events

Recruitment & Retention Webinar Keep Talented Teachers and Improve Student Outcomes
Keep talented teachers and unlock student success with strategic planning based on insights from Apple 91制片厂视频 and educational leaders.鈥
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of 91制片厂视频 Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Families & the Community Webinar
Family Engagement: The Foundation for a Strong School Year
Learn how family engagement promotes student success with insights from National PTA, AASA鈥痑nd leading districts and schools.鈥
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of 91制片厂视频 Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Special 91制片厂视频 Webinar
How Early Adopters of Remote Therapy are Improving IEPs
Learn how schools are using remote therapy to improve IEP compliance & scalability while delivering outcomes comparable to onsite providers.
Content provided by 

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide 鈥 elementary, middle, high school and more.
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.

Read Next

Federal Days After Georgia Shooting, No Mention of Safety or Schools in Trump-Harris Debate
The debate came less than a week after two students and two teachers were killed at Apalachee High School in Winder, Ga.
3 min read
Ball State University students watch a presidential debate between Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump, left, and Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris, Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2024, in Muncie, Ind.
Ball State University students watch a presidential debate between Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump, left, and Democratic presidential nominee Vice President Kamala Harris, Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2024, in Muncie, Ind.
Darron Cummings/AP
Federal Photos PHOTOS: Behind the Scenes at the Moms for Liberty National Summit
Former President Trump was a keynote the final night鈥攁nd said little about schools.
1 min read
Moms for Liberty member Aura Moody dances with others at the annual Moms For Liberty Summit in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 30, 2024.
Moms for Liberty member Aura Moody dances with others at the conservative parents' rights organization's annual summit in Washington, on Friday, August 30, 2024.
Lawren Simmons for 91制片厂视频 Week
Federal At Moms for Liberty National Summit, Trump Hardly Mentions 91制片厂视频
In a "fireside chat" with a co-founder of the parents' rights group, the former president didn't discuss his education policy priorities.
5 min read
Republican presidential nominee former President Donald Trump speaks with Moms for Liberty co-founder Tiffany Justice during an event at the group's annual convention in Washington, Friday, Aug. 30, 2024.
Former President Donald Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, speaks with Tiffany Justice, a Moms for Liberty co-founder, during the group's national summit on Friday Aug. 30, 2024, in Washington. The former president spoke only briefly about issues directly related to education.
Mark Schiefelbein/AP
Federal Then & Now Why It's So Hard to Kill the 91制片厂视频 Department鈥攁nd Why Some Keep Trying
Project 2025 popularized plans to end the U.S. Department of 91制片厂视频, but the idea has been around since the agency's inception.
9 min read
President Ronald Reagan is flanked by 91制片厂视频 Secretary Terrel Bell, left, during a meeting Feb. 23, 1984 meeting  in the Cabinet Room at the White House.
President Ronald Reagan is flanked by 91制片厂视频 Secretary Terrel Bell, left, during a meeting Feb. 23, 1984 meeting in the Cabinet Room at the White House. Bell, who once testified in favor of creating the U.S. Department of 91制片厂视频, wrote the first plan to dismantle the agency.
91制片厂视频 Week with AP