The full Senate and the House education committee approved separate bills last week to reauthorize the federal career and technical education program, showing no apparent appetite for President Bush鈥檚 proposal to eliminate its funding.
The Senate and House education committees unanimously approved legislation to renew the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Technical 91制片厂视频 Act on March 9. A day later, the Senate approved its bill, 99-0. The measure has not yet reached the floor of the House.
Just weeks earlier, the Bush administration proposed eliminating the entire $1.3 billion program from the federal budget in fiscal 2006, and redirecting the money to the president鈥檚 $1.5 billion High School Initiative.
The proposal to scrap funding for the Perkins program has drawn broad opposition from vocational education advocates and a bipartisan cross-section of Congress.
Read the related story,
Before voting to approve the reauthorization bill, which does not set the amount that will actually be appropriated for the program, several Democrats on the House 91制片厂视频 and the Workforce Committee jabbed the president鈥檚 proposed cuts.
After listening to several Democratic rebukes of the administration鈥檚 proposal, Rep. John A. Boehner, R-Ohio, the chairman of the committee, retorted that such criticism amounted to needless partisanship considering the bipartisan support for the reauthorization bill.
鈥淭his underlying bill is a very clear signal for the intentions of Congress,鈥� he said.
Department is Opposed
After the two committees鈥� actions, the Department of 91制片厂视频 released letters sent by Secretary of 91制片厂视频 Margaret Spellings to Rep. Boehner and Sen. Michael B. Enzi, R-Wyo., the chairman of the Senate Health, 91制片厂视频, Labor, and Pensions Committee, expressing her 鈥渟trong opposition鈥� to both pieces of legislation.
The legislation to reauthorize the Perkins program 鈥渄oes little to address the current challenge that has been highlighted by President Bush and the nation鈥檚 governors to reform our nation鈥檚 high schools,鈥� wrote Ms. Spellings. She added: 鈥淭he Perkins Act requires fundamental changes to its mission and focus.鈥�
